Fundamentalist: "I Get No Respect
from Spong."
More
In the world according to Spong, there are no fundamentalist
scholars or theologians. Works supporting liberalism are "well
written and even brilliant works of biblical scholarship," whereas
works supporting biblical inerrancy are "tracts, pamphlets, and
books from the pens of fundamentalist Christians" . "No biblical
scholar" thinks Adam was a historical person ; he knows of no
biblical scholar who thinks John the apostle wrote the Fourth
Gospel , nor any "reputable" scholar who accepts the Virgin
Birth . Apparently, Spong lives a very sheltered life.
The bishop has little respect for fundamentalists. In his
opinion anyone who holds that the Bible is without error "is simply
unaware of vast areas of reality that are common knowledge to
people of this century". They are "afraid of knowledge" .
Not only are they ignorant, they are culturally backward; thus
Spong refers to "fundamentalists and their more sophisticated city
cousins". They are apparently not even capable of abstract
thought . They are fearful, insecure people who are not
serious Christians and who do not even bother to read the Bible
they pretend to defend . "The periodic revivals of fundamentalism are momentary blips on the EKG charts of
religious history" .
It must be admitted that there is a cultural fundamentalism
that deserves criticism. Associated especially with the "Bible
Belt" (although, of course, it is not limited to that region, and
many believers there do not fit this stereotype), it is
characterized by fear, hate, insecurity, prejudice, sexism, and
anti-intellectualism. Spong was evidently raised in such a
fundamentalism . He rightly criticizes its segregationist
views . He mentions its taboo against women wearing makeup,
to which might be added a long list of taboos against
drinking, card-playing, watching television, and the like. If this
were the fundamentalism from which Spong wished to rescue the
Bible, I, for one, would be happy to join the rescue effort.
Unfortunately, Spong's attacks against this easily criticized
fundamentalism are really only target practice for a much more
formidable enemy. Though he never defines the term
'fundamentalists,' it is clear that in most cases he means by it
all those who take the Bible "literally" and regard it as
"inerrant". In fact, at one point he explicitly
equates fundamentalism with evangelicalism .
Spong's target is not limited to card-carrying evangelicals who
affirm without embarrassment the inerrancy of the Bible. Spong
wants to rescue the Bible from all who take its historical,
doctrinal, and ethical statements seriously. "There are concepts in
the Bible that are repugnant to the modern consciousness" --
and repugnant to him, as well . The Bible presents a
nationalistic, sadistic God that Spong "cannot respect, much less
worship". The Gospels present a Jesus who is
sometimes "narrow-minded, vindictive, and even hypocritical" .
The "list of objectionable passages could be expanded almost
endlessly", and unbelievable things "are discoverable and
present in almost every part of the Bible". Spong confesses,
"A literal Bible presents me with far more problems than assets."
In the view of Bishop Spong, the resurrection of Jesus as a
"literal" restoration of the dead body of Jesus to life is a myth.
As such, it must be "demythologized" -- that is, its mythic
elements must be identified and stripped away. But he warns that we
cannot stop there, but must go on to "remythologize." That is, we
must reinterpret it according to our own world view, which is also
destined to be discarded by future generations as mythological.
According to Spong, for Paul the Resurrection "occurred not on
the literal third day but on the eschatological third day, for it
was beyond time and history". This sounds more like the
German theologian Paul Tillich than Paul the apostle. For Paul the
very significance of Christ's resurrection was that the
resurrection of the dead had been inaugurated in time and history
with Jesus as its "first fruits" (1 Cor.
15:12-28).
Robert Lyle
Released August 31, 1994
Copyright 1994 by the Christian Research Institute.